Tuesday, May 6, 2014

DEATH OF A SALESMAN

A few weeks ago the world’s most visible international brand consultant, Wally Olins, passed away. Obituaries and tributes immediately appeared in European papers and industry trade journals. Curiously, so far nothing of substance has surfaced in major American media, who prominently cover the deaths of actors and obscure Austrian documentary film-makers dead from malaria, those whom I –as an international brand advisor- consider of lesser interest and importance than Wally. Mr. Olins was a global presence, whose work, writings and opinions made headlines over a career which spanned a half century. The radio silence from American shores is deafening.

It can’t be because of his success or failure rate, both considerable. Olins and partner Michael Wolff founded the formidable Wolff Olins consultancy, the name and reputation of which still survive as a division of Omnicom, though both of the principals long ago left the practice. In their heyday Olins & Co. advised the Beatles on the Apple brand, turned an obscure telecom into the phenomenon still called Orange, rebranded British Telecom, renamed Guinness into Diageo, revamped Cunard, tried to repackage the UK as Cool Brittanica, and endeavored to convince the world that Poland was a vital place to do business. He proposed many of those strange-sounding and quickly dated hybrid names (Invensys, Unison) that thankfully never took hold in the popular mind. In his later years as CEO of Saffron he championed culture as the essential aspect of a brand. His last great public act was a spirited defense of the 2012 London Olympics logo which his namesake firm had created. Late in the game he became an advocate for place branding which sometimes works, but not always. His final book (he wrote seven, which were translated into 18 languages), “The Brand New – The Shape of Brands To Come”, released a month ago by Thames & Hudson, is already ranked in the 28,000s on Amazon, no mean feat for a nonfiction title.

Once upon a time branding was called ‘corporate identity’, and referred to a rigid system of graphical standards which visually defined an organization. That idea was expanded on by Wally Olins, who felt that brands encompassed deeper and more dimensional values than veneer can effectively suggest. But he never really left the visual idiom far behind, and he barely engaged the philosophical questions that practitioners actively debate today. Though his ultimate book is rich with machine-gun questions, it’s clear that Wally never left the world of advertising, hype, and its ready engagement of emotional manipulation. Brand people today ponder the implications of consumerism, waste, climate change, sustainability, workforce contentment, community building, ethics. Wally did champion authenticity in his last act, and that is a valid part of the defense. But he never seriously challenged the bottom-line agenda or short-horizon thinking that has got the world into such a confusion. Can organizations do good at the same time as doing well? While he asked it, Olins never answered that question.

Like or disagree with what Wally Olins preached, the fact remains that he presided over an era where the brand discipline came into its own, migrating away from simple cosmetics, differentiating our lot from admen and marketing types. He barely pondered the ingrained complicity with bankrupt economic paradigms. It is a brand new world, and brands are strategic tools for transformation. Emerging economies will have the same troubles if they adopt the old practices. Homogenization won’t be the problem, as Wally Olins feared. Changing the name, changing the look, summoning rhetoric only works so far for organizations. Stakeholders understand this. Marketing is on its last legs, advertising -executing a wild somersault- now brands itself “content-creation.” Which may be the reason America has gone silent on the passing of this lion of the Old Guard. The guy asked too many questions.

Monday, July 8, 2013

Friday, July 5, 2013

First get quieter, then get smarter







A very clever design company in Istanbul has deconstructed packaging in a group of exercises to show how little conventional branding is needed to be effective.
http://www.a2591.com/2010/12/minimalist-effect-in-maximalist-market.html
The first 3 images above at the left are their work. I've expanded on the process in the right 3 manipulations to explore some additional ideas. Jar #4 shows quieter branding with the legacy signature. Jar #5 shows no branding at all and forces a meditation on the wasteful economics of FMCG packages in general. Jar #6 shows a more sustainable reusable and functional redevelopment with a tiny brand signature.

Saturday, May 18, 2013

Brand irony and brain candy

A free (my italics) no-wi-fi zone which blocks signals so people can sit and have a real uninterrupted conversation, free of personal communication devices. But not free of Kit Kat. So not really free. You can't use it unless you avail yourself of the brand messaging. 

Creating quieter brands

One of my students asked last week how to create a Quiet Brand.

Within days my colleague Jack Yan posted these photos of a new Absolut packaging.

The bottle shape, cap and molded seal are all iconic, so the visual branding is intact. Absolut has built market recognition on the silhouette of their packaging. The removal of the large and bold brand name doesn't detract from the profile.

The other great aspect of this limited edition is that it is cause-related. The quieter brand ironically calls attention to itself since it stands in opposition to the traditional packaging. You ask, "Why did they do it?" and the light shines on the cause.

Saturday, April 27, 2013

Brand Ambivalence



How conflicted is Coke?

They make a huge deal about their "plant bottle" which is supposed to save the planet because it is made from all sustainable materials.

But they put flip-flops on their Summer packaging. Marketing wins, Mother Earth loses. Discarded flip-flops are one of the greatest marine pollutants. Do the research, Coke.

The missed opportunity: a simple message in tiny typography, to wit, "Have a great Summer. When you're choosing this year's footwear, make sure it's biodegradable."

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Au revoir PPR, salut Kering

Applause for the decision to rename the respected French holding company, but let's hope it is the ultimate rebranding, after 5 name changes since 1988. That's a lot of focus-shift for less than three decades.The logic is sound: signaling the migration from retail to luxury and lifestyle emphasis.


The new visual branding blows hot and cold. I like the grotesque letterforms which have enough individuality and personality to express customization. The stylized "owl in flight" signet doesn't do it for me, though. It's rather dispersed and hard to recognize, and I am not sure it adds anything other than distraction from the new brand name. I would have been happy with the heart-shaped owl face by itself. But let's not overemphasize visual branding, which is nowhere as important as graphic designers want you to believe. The proving ground will be the way the company conducts itself and lives out its vision and values.

Let me repeat the classic scenarios for rebranding: new ownership, acquisition or merger; following bad news; at a time of radical change in competency or category; coincidental to a significant product launch; to gain greater differentiation from competitors, especially in new markets.